<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.22 (Ruby 3.0.2) -->
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-schmutzer-pals-ple-02" category="std" consensus="true" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.16.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="PLE">Private Line Emulation over Packet Switched Networks</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schmutzer-pals-ple-02"/>
    <author initials="S." surname="Gringeri" fullname="Steven Gringeri">
      <organization>Verizon</organization>
      <address>
        <email>steven.gringeri@verizon.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Whittaker" fullname="Jeremy Whittaker">
      <organization>Verizon</organization>
      <address>
        <email>jeremy.whittaker@verizon.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="N." surname="Leymann" fullname="Nicolai Leymann">
      <organization>Deutsche Telekom</organization>
      <address>
        <email>N.Leymann@telekom.de</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Schmutzer" fullname="Christian Schmutzer" role="editor">
      <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>cschmutz@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="L." surname="Della Chiesa" fullname="Luca Della Chiesa">
      <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>ldellach@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="N." surname="Nainar" fullname="Nagendra Kumar Nainar" role="editor">
      <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>naikumar@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Pignataro" fullname="Carlos Pignataro">
      <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>cpignata@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="G." surname="Smallegange" fullname="Gerald Smallegange">
      <organization>Ciena Corporation</organization>
      <address>
        <email>gsmalleg@ciena.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Brown" fullname="Chris Brown">
      <organization>Ciena Corporation</organization>
      <address>
        <email>cbrown@ciena.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="F." surname="Dada" fullname="Faisal Dada">
      <organization>Xilinx</organization>
      <address>
        <email>faisald@xilinx.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2023" month="February" day="20"/>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document describes a method for encapsulating high-speed bit-streams as virtual private wire services (VPWS) over packet switched networks (PSN) providing complete signal transport transparency.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction-and-motivation">
      <name>Introduction and Motivation</name>
      <t>This document describes a method called Private Line Emulation (PLE) for encapsulating high-speed bit-streams as Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS) over Packet Switched Networks (PSN). This emulation suits applications where signal transparency is required and data or framing structure interpretation of the PE would be counter productive.</t>
      <t>One example is two ethernet connected CEs and the need for synchronous ethernet operation between them without the intermediate PEs interfering or addressing concerns about ethernet control protocol transparency for carrier ethernet services, beyond the  behavior definitions of MEF specifications.</t>
      <t>Another example would be a Storage Area Networking (SAN) extension between two data centers. Operating at a bit-stream level allows for a connection between Fibre Channel switches without interfering with any of the Fibre Channel protocol mechanisms.</t>
      <t>Also SONET/SDH add/drop multiplexers or cross-connects can be interconnected without interfering with the multiplexing structures and networks mechanisms. This is a key distinction to CEP defined in <xref target="RFC4842"/> where demultiplexing and multiplexing is desired in order to operate per SONET Synchronous Payload Envelope (SPE) and Virtual Tributary (VT) or SDH Virtual Container (VC). Said in another way, PLE does provide an independent layer network underneath the SONET/SDH layer network, whereas CEP does operate at the same level and peer with the SONET/SDH layer network.</t>
      <t>The mechanisms described in this document follow principals similar to <xref target="RFC4553"/> but expanding the applicability beyond the narrow set of PDH interfaces (T1, E1, T3 and E3) and allow the transport of signals from many different technologies such as Ethernet, Fibre Channel, SONET/SDH <xref target="GR253"/>/<xref target="G.707"/> and OTN <xref target="G.709"/> at gigabit speeds by treating them as bit-stream payload defined in sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 of <xref target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="requirements-notation">
      <name>Requirements Notation</name>
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology-and-reference-model">
      <name>Terminology and Reference Model</name>
      <section anchor="terminology">
        <name>Terminology</name>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>ACH - Associated Channel Header</li>
          <li>AIS - Alarm Indication Signal</li>
          <li>CBR - Constant Bit Rate</li>
          <li>CE - Customer Edge</li>
          <li>CSRC - Contributing SouRCe</li>
          <li>ES - Errored Second</li>
          <li>FEC - Forward Error Correction</li>
          <li>IWF - InterWorking Function</li>
          <li>LDP - Label Distribution Protocol</li>
          <li>LF - Local Fault</li>
          <li>MPLS - Multi Protocol Label Switching</li>
          <li>NSP - Native Service Processor</li>
          <li>ODUk - Optical Data Unit k</li>
          <li>OTN - Optical Transport Network</li>
          <li>OTUk - Optical Transport Unit k</li>
          <li>PCS - Physical Coding Sublayer</li>
          <li>PE - Provider Edge</li>
          <li>PLE - Private Line Emulation</li>
          <li>PLOS - Packet Loss Of Signal</li>
          <li>PSN - Packet Switched Network</li>
          <li>P2P - Point-to-Point</li>
          <li>QOS - Quality Of Service</li>
          <li>RSVP-TE - Resource Reservation Protocol Traffic Engineering</li>
          <li>RTCP - RTP Control Protocol</li>
          <li>RTP - Realtime Transport Protocol</li>
          <li>SAN - Storage Area Network</li>
          <li>SES - Severely Errored Seconds</li>
          <li>SDH - Synchronous Digital Hierarchy</li>
          <li>SPE - Synchronous Payload Envelope</li>
          <li>SRTP - Secure Realtime Transport Protocol</li>
          <li>SRv6 - Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane</li>
          <li>SSRC - Synchronization SouRCe</li>
          <li>SONET - Synchronous Optical Network</li>
          <li>TCP - Transmission Control Protocol</li>
          <li>UAS - Unavailable Seconds</li>
          <li>VPWS - Virtual Private Wire Service</li>
          <li>VC - Virtual Circuit</li>
          <li>VT - Virtual Tributary</li>
        </ul>
        <t>Similar to <xref target="RFC4553"/> and <xref target="RFC5086"/> the term Interworking Function (IWF) is used to describe the functional block that encapsulates bit streams into PLE packets and in the reverse direction decapsulates PLE packets and reconstructs bit streams.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="reference-models">
        <name>Reference Models</name>
        <t>The generic reference model defined in <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4664"/> and <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/> does apply to PLE. Further the model defined in <xref section="4.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/> and in particular the concept of a Native Service Processing (NSP) function defined in <xref section="4.2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/> does apply to PLE as well. The resulting reference model for PLE is illustrated in <xref target="ref_model"/></t>
        <figure anchor="ref_model">
          <name>PLE Reference Model</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                |<--- p2p L2VPN service -->|
                |                          |
                |     |<-PSN tunnel->|     |
                v     v              v     v
            +---------+              +---------+
            |   PE1   |==============|   PE2   |
            +---+-----+              +-----+---+
+-----+     | N |     |              |     | N |     +-----+
| CE1 |-----| S | IWF |.....VPWS.....| IWF | S |-----| CE2 |
+-----+  ^  | P |     |              |     | P |  ^  +-----+
         |  +---+-----+              +-----+---+  |
  CE1 physical  ^                          ^  CE2 physical
   interface    |                          |   interface 
                |<--- emulated service --->|
                |                          |
            attachment                 attachment
             circuit                    circuit
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>PLE embraces the minimum intervention principle outlined in <xref section="3.3.5" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/> whereas the data is flowing through the PLE encapsulation layer as received without modifications.</t>
        <t>For some service types the NSP function is responsible for performing operations on the native data received from the CE. Examples are terminating Forward Error Correction (FEC) or terminating the OTUk layer for OTN. After the NSP the IWF is generating the payload of the VPWS which is carried via a PSN tunnel.</t>
        <figure anchor="diff_clock">
          <name>Relative Network Scenario Timing</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                    J
                    |                                         G
                    v                                         |
                    +-----+                 +-----+           v
   +-----+          |- - -|=================|- - -|          +-----+
   |     |<---------|.............................|<---------|     |
   | CE1 |          | PE1 |       VPWS      | PE2 |          | CE2 |
   |     |--------->|.............................|--------->|     |
   +-----+          |- - -|=================|- - -|          +-----+
        ^           +-----+<-------+------->+-----+
        |                          |              ^
        A                         +-+             |
                                  |I|             E
                                  +-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>To allow the clock of the transported signal to be carried across the PLE domain in a transparent way the network 
synchronization reference model and deployment scenario outlined in <xref section="4.3.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4197"/> is applicable.</t>
        <t>As illustrated in <xref target="diff_clock"/>, the attachment circuit clock E is generated by PE2 via a differential clock recovery method in reference to a common clock I. For this to work the difference between clock I and clock A MUST be explicitly transferred between the PE1 and PE2 using the timestamp inside the RTP header.</t>
        <t>For the reverse direction PE1 does generate the clock J in reference to clock I and the clock difference between I and G.</t>
        <t>The way the common clock I is implemented is out of scope of this document. Well established concepts for achieving frequency synchronization in a PSN have already been defined in <xref target="G.8261"/> and can be applied here as well.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="emulated-services">
      <name>Emulated Services</name>
      <t>This specification does describe the emulation of services from a wide range of technologies such as TDM, ethernet, fibre channel or OTN as bit stream or structured bit stream as defined in <xref section="3.3.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/> and <xref section="3.3.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
      <section anchor="generic-ple-service">
        <name>Generic PLE Service</name>
        <t>The generic PLE service is an example of the bit stream defined in <xref section="3.3.3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
        <t>Under the assumption that the CE-bound IWF is not responsible for any service specific operation, a bit stream of any rate can be carried using the generic PLE payload.</t>
        <t>There is no NSP function present for this service.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ethernet-services">
        <name>Ethernet services</name>
        <t>Ethernet services are special cases of the structure bit stream defined in <xref section="3.3.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
        <t>IEEE has defined several layers for ethernet in <xref target="IEEE802.3"/>. Emulation is operating at the physical (PHY) layer, more precisely at the Physical Subcoding Layer (PCS).</t>
        <t>Over time many differnet ethernet interface types have been specified in <xref target="IEEE802.3"/> with a varying set of characteristcs such as optional vs mandatory FEC and single-lane vs multi-lane transmission. Having said that all ethernet services are leverging the basic PLE payload and interface specific mechanisms are confined to the respective service specific NSP functions.</t>
        <section anchor="gbase-r-and-25gbase-r">
          <name>10GBASE-R and 25GBASE-R</name>
          <t>The PCS layers of 10GBASE-R defined in clause 49 and 25GBASE-R defined in clause 107 of <xref target="IEEE802.3"/> are based on a 64B/66B code.</t>
          <t><xref target="IEEE802.3"/> clauses 74 and 108 do define a optional FEC layer, if present the PSN-bound NSP function MUST terminate the FEC and the CE-bound NSP function must generate the FEC.</t>
          <t>The PSN-bound NSP function is also responsible to detect 10GBASE-R and 25GBASE-R specific attachment circuits faults such as LOS and sync loss.</t>
          <t>The PSN-bound IWF is mapping the scrambled 64B/66B data into the basic PLE payload.</t>
          <t>The CE-bound NSP function MUST perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>PCS code sync</li>
            <li>descrambling</li>
          </ul>
          <t>in order to properly</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>transform invalid 66B code blocks into proper error control characters /E/</li>
            <li>insert Local Fault (LF) ordered sets when the CE-bound IWF is in PLOS state or when PLE packets are received with the L-bit being set</li>
          </ul>
          <t>Note: Invalid 66B code blocks typically are a consequence of the CE-bound IWF inserting replacement data in case of lost PLE packets, or if the farend PSN-bound NSP function did set sync headers to 11 due to uncorrectable FEC errors.</t>
          <t>Before sending the bit stream to the CE, the CE-bound NSP function MUST also scramble the 64B/66B code.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="gbase-r-50gbase-r-and-100gbase-r">
          <name>40GBASE-R, 50GBASE-R and 100GBASE-R</name>
          <t>The PCS layers of 40GBASE-R and 100GBASE-R defined in clause 82 and of 50GBASE-R defined in clause 133 of <xref target="IEEE802.3"/> are based on a 64B/66B code transmitted over multiple lanes.</t>
          <t><xref target="IEEE802.3"/> clauses 74 and 91 do define a optional FEC layer, if present the PSN-bound NSP function MUST terminate the FEC and the CE-bound NSP function must generate the FEC.</t>
          <t>To gain access to the scrambled 64B/66B code the PSN-bound NSP further MUST perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>block synchronization</li>
            <li>PCS lane deskew</li>
            <li>PCS lane reordering</li>
          </ul>
          <t>The PSN-bound NSP function is also responsible to detect 40GBASE-R, 50GBASE-R and 100GBASE-R specific attachment circuits faults such as LOS and sync loss.</t>
          <t>The PSN-bound IWF is mapping the serialized, scrambled 64B/66B code stream including the alignment markers into the basic PLE payload.</t>
          <t>The CE-bound NSP function MUST perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>PCS code sync</li>
            <li>alignment marker removal</li>
            <li>descrambling</li>
          </ul>
          <t>in order to properly</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>transform invalid 66B code blocks into proper error control characters /E/</li>
            <li>insert Local Fault (LF) ordered sets when the CE-bound IWF is in PLOS state or when PLE packets are received with the L-bit being set</li>
          </ul>
          <t>Note: Invalid 66B code blocks typically are a consequence of the CE-bound IWF inserting replacement data in case of lost PLE packets, or if the farend PSN-bound NSP function did set sync headers to 11 due to uncorrectable FEC errors.</t>
          <t>When sending the bit stream to the CE, the CE-bound NSP function MUST also perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>scrambling of the 64B/66B code</li>
            <li>block distribution</li>
            <li>alignment marker insertion</li>
          </ul>
        </section>
        <section anchor="gbase-r-and-400gbase-r">
          <name>200GBASE-R and 400GBASE-R</name>
          <t>The PCS layers of 200GBASE-R and 400GBASE-R defined in clause 119 of <xref target="IEEE802.3"/> are based on a 64B/66B code transcoded to 
a 256B/257B code to reduce the overhead and make room for a mandatory FEC.</t>
          <t>To gain access to the 64B/66B code the PSN-bound NSP further MUST perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>alignment lock and deskew</li>
            <li>PCS Lane reordering and de-interleaving</li>
            <li>FEC decoding</li>
            <li>post-FEC interleaving</li>
            <li>alignment marker removal</li>
            <li>descrambling</li>
            <li>reverse transcoding from 256B/257B to 64B/66B</li>
          </ul>
          <t>Further the PSN-bound NSP MUST perform rate compensation and scrambling before the PSN-bound IWF is mapping the same into the basic PLE payload.</t>
          <t>Rate compensation is applied so that the rate of the 66B encoded bit stream carried by PLE is 528/544 times the nominal bitrate of the 200GBASE-R or 400GBASE-R at the PMA service interface. X number of 66 byte long rate compensation blocks are inserted every X*20479 number of 66B client blocks. For 200GBASE-R the value of X is 16 and for 400GBASE-R the value of X is 32. Rate compensation blocks are special 66B control characters of type 0x00 that can easily be searched for by the CE-bound IWF in order to remove them.</t>
          <t>The PSN-bound NSP function is also responsible to detect 200GBASE-R and 400GBASE-R specific attachment circuits faults such as LOS and sync loss.</t>
          <t>The CE-bound NSP function MUST perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>PCS code sync</li>
            <li>descrambling</li>
            <li>rate compensation block removal</li>
          </ul>
          <t>in order to properly</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>transform invalid 66B code blocks into proper error control characters /E/</li>
            <li>insert Local Fault (LF) ordered sets when the CE-bound IWF is in PLOS state or when PLE packets are received with the L-bit being set</li>
          </ul>
          <t>Note: Invalid 66B code blocks typically are a consequence of the CE-bound IWF inserting replacement data in case of lost PLE packets, or if the farend PSN-bound NSP function did set sync headers to 11 due to uncorrectable FEC errors.</t>
          <t>When sending the bit stream to the CE, the CE-bound NSP function MUST also perform</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>transcoding from 64B/66B to 256B/257B</li>
            <li>scrambling</li>
            <li>aligment marker insertion</li>
            <li>pre-FEC distribution</li>
            <li>FEC encoding</li>
            <li>PCS Lane distribution</li>
          </ul>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sonetsdh-services">
        <name>SONET/SDH Services</name>
        <t>SONET/SDH services are special cases of the structured bit stream defined in <xref section="3.3.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
        <t>SDH interfaces are defined in <xref target="G.707"/> and SONET interfaces are defined in <xref target="GR253"/>.</t>
        <t>The PSN-bound NSP function does not modify the received data but is responsible to detect SONET/SDH interface specific attachment circuit faults such as LOS, LOF and OOF.</t>
        <t>Data received by the PSN-bound IWF is mapped into the basic PLE payload without any awareness of SONET/SDH frames.</t>
        <t>When the CE-bound IWF is in PLOS state or when PLE packets are received with the L-bit being set, the CE-bound NSP function is responsible for generating the</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>MS-AIS maintenance signal defined in clause 6.2.4.1.1 of <xref target="G.707"/> for SDH services</li>
          <li>AIS-L maintenance signal defined in clause 6.2.1.2 of <xref target="GR253"/> for SONET services</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="fibre-channel-services">
        <name>Fibre Channel Services</name>
        <t>TO BE ADDED</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="oduk-otn-services">
        <name>ODUk OTN Services</name>
        <t>ODUk services are special cases of the structured bit stream defined in <xref section="3.3.4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>.</t>
        <t>OTN interfaces are defined in <xref target="G.709"/>.</t>
        <t>The PSN-bound NSP function MUST terminate the FEC and present to the IWF an extended ODUk including a valid frame alignment overhead. Further OTN interface specific attachment circuit faults such as LOS are to</t>
        <t>The PSN-bound NSP function is also responsible to detect OTUk specific attachment circuits faults such as LOS, LOF, LOM, AIS and DEG.</t>
        <t>For ODUk services the PSN-bound IWF MUST use the byte aligned PLE payload.</t>
        <t>The CE-bound NSP function will recover the ODUk by searching for the frame alignment overhead and generate the FEC.</t>
        <t>When the CE-bound IWF is in PLOS state or when PLE packets are received with the L-bit being set, the CE-bound NSP function is responsible for generating the ODUk-AIS maintenance signal defined in clause 16.5.1 of <xref target="G.709"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="ple-encapsulation-layer">
      <name>PLE Encapsulation Layer</name>
      <t>The basic packet format used by PLE is shown in the <xref target="encap"/>.</t>
      <figure anchor="encap">
        <name>PLE Encapsulation Layer</name>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
+-------------------------------+  -+
|     PSN and VPWS Demux        |    \
|          (MPLS/SRv6)          |     > PSN and VPWS
|                               |    /  Demux Headers
+-------------------------------+  -+
|        PLE Control Word       |    \
+-------------------------------+     > PLE Header
|           RTP Header          |    /
+-------------------------------+ --+
|          Bit Stream           |    \
|           Payload             |     > Payload
|                               |    /
+-------------------------------+ --+
]]></artwork>
      </figure>
      <section anchor="psn-and-vpws-demultiplexing-headers">
        <name>PSN and VPWS Demultiplexing Headers</name>
        <t>This document does not imply any specific technology to be used for implementing the VPWS demultiplexing and PSN layers.</t>
        <t>When a MPLS PSN layer is used. A VPWS label provides the demultiplexing mechanism as described in <xref section="5.4.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3985"/>. The PSN tunnel can be a simple best path Label Switched Path (LSP) established using LDP <xref target="RFC5036"/> or Segment Routing <xref target="RFC8402"/> or a traffic engineered LSP established using RSVP-TE <xref target="RFC3209"/> or SR-TE <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>
        <t>When PLE is applied to a SRv6 based PSN, the mechanisms defined in <xref target="RFC8402"/> and the End.DX2 endpoint behavior defined in <xref target="RFC8986"/> do apply.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ple-header">
        <name>PLE Header</name>
        <t>The PLE header MUST contain the PLE control word (4 bytes) and MUST include a fixed size RTP header <xref target="RFC3550"/>. The RTP header MUST immediately follow the PLE control word.</t>
        <section anchor="ple-control-word">
          <name>PLE Control Word</name>
          <t>The format of the PLE control word is in line with the guidance in <xref target="RFC4385"/> and is shown in <xref target="cw"/>.</t>
          <figure anchor="cw">
            <name>PLE Control Word</name>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0 0 0 0|L|R|RSV|FRG|   LEN     |       Sequence number         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
          <t>The bits 0..3 of the first nibble are set to 0 to differentiate a control word or Associated Channel Header (ACH) from an IP packet or ethernet frame. The first nibble MUST be set to 0000b to indicate that this header is a control word as defined in <xref section="3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4385"/>.</t>
          <t>The other fields in the control word are used as defined below:</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>L</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>Set by the PE to indicate that data carried in the payload is invalid due to an attachment circuit fault. The downstream PE MUST play out appropriate replacement data. The NSP MAY inject an appropriate native fault propagation signal.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>R</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>Set by the downstream PE to indicate that the IWF experiences packet loss from the PSN or a server layer backward fault indication is present in the NSP. The R bit MUST be cleared by the PE once the packet loss state or fault indication has cleared.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>RSV</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>These bits are reserved for future use. This field MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>FRG</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>These bits MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>LEN</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>In accordance to <xref section="3" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC4385"/> the length field MUST always be set to zero as there is no padding added to the PLE packet. To detect malformed packets the default, preconfigured or signaled payload size MUST be assumed.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>Sequence number</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The sequence number field is used to provide a common PW sequencing function as well as detection of lost packets. It MUST be generated in accordance with the rules defined in <xref section="5.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC3550"/> and MUST be incremented with every PLE packet being sent.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
        </section>
        <section anchor="rtp-header">
          <name>RTP Header</name>
          <t>The RTP header MUST be included and is used for explicit transfer of timing information. The RTP header is purely a formal reuse and RTP mechanisms, such as header extensions, contributing source (CSRC) list, padding, RTP Control Protocol (RTCP), RTP header compression, Secure Realtime Transport Protocol (SRTP), etc., are not applicable to PLE VPWS.</t>
          <t>The format of the RTP header is as shown in <xref target="rtp"/>.</t>
          <figure anchor="rtp">
            <name>RTP Header</name>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       Sequence Number         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                           Timestamp                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           Synchronization Source (SSRC) Identifier            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>V: Version</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The version field MUST be set to 2.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>P: Padding</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The padding flag MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>X: Header extension</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The X bit MUST be set to zero by sender and ignored by receiver.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>CC: CSRC count</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The CC field MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>PT: Payload type</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>A PT value MUST be allocated from the range of dynamic values defined by <xref target="RFC3551"/> for each direction of the VPWS. The same PT value MAY be reused both for direction and between different PLE VPWS.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>Sequence number</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The Sequence number in the RTP header MUST be qual to the sequence number in the PLE control word. The sequence number of the RTP header MAY be used to extend the sequence number of the PLE control word from 16 to 32 bits. If so, the initial value of the RTP sequence number MUST be 0 and incremented whenever the PLE control word sequence number cycles through from 0xFFFF to 0x0000.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>Timestamp</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>Timestamp values are used in accordance with the rules established in <xref target="RFC3550"/>. For bit-streams up to 200 Gbps the frequency of the clock used for generating timestamps MUST be 125 MHz based on a the common clock I. For bit-streams above 200 Gbps the frequency MUST be 250 MHz.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>SSRC: Synchronization source</li>
          </ul>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>The SSRC field MAY be used for detection of misconnections.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="ple-payload-layer">
      <name>PLE Payload Layer</name>
      <t>A bit-stream is mapped into a PLE packet with a fixed payload size which MUST be defined during VPWS setup, MUST be the same in both directions of the VPWS and MUST remain unchanged for the lifetime of the VPWS.</t>
      <t>All PLE implementations MUST be capable of supporting the default payload size of 1024 bytes.</t>
      <section anchor="basic-payload">
        <name>Basic Payload</name>
        <t>The PLE payload is filled with incoming bits of the bit-stream starting from the most significant to the least significant bit without considering any structure of the bit-stream.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="byte-aligned-payload">
        <name>Byte aligned Payload</name>
        <t>The PLE payload is filled in a byte aligned manner, where the order of the payload bytes corresponds to their order on the attachment circuit. Consecutive bits coming from the attachment circuit fill each payload byte starting from most significant bit to least significant.</t>
        <t>All PLE implementations MUST support the transport of OTN bit-streams using the byte aligned payload.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="ple-operation">
      <name>PLE Operation</name>
      <section anchor="common-considerations">
        <name>Common Considerations</name>
        <t>A PLE VPWS can be established using manual configuration or leveraging mechanisms of a signaling protocol.</t>
        <t>Furthermore emulation of bit-stream signals using PLE is only possible when the two attachment circuits of the VPWS are of the same type (OC192, 10GBASE-R, ODU2, etc) and are using the same PLE payload type and payload size. This can be ensured via manual configuration or via a signaling protocol</t>
        <t>PLE related control protocol extensions to PWE3 <xref target="RFC4447"/> and EVPN-VPWS <xref target="RFC8214"/> are out of scope of this document and are described in <xref target="I-D.schmutzer-bess-ple-vpws-signalling"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ple-iwf-operation">
        <name>PLE IWF Operation</name>
        <section anchor="psn-bound-encapsulation-behavior">
          <name>PSN-bound Encapsulation Behavior</name>
          <t>After the VPWS is set up, the PSN-bound IWF does perform the following steps:</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>Packetize the data received from the CE is into a fixed size PLE payloads</li>
            <li>Add PLE control word and RTP header with sequence numbers, flags and timestamps properly set</li>
            <li>Add the VPWS demultiplexer and PSN headers</li>
            <li>Transmit the resulting packets over the PSN</li>
            <li>Set L bit in the PLE control word whenever attachment circuit detects a fault</li>
            <li>Set R bit in the PLE control word whenever the local CE-bound IWF is in packet loss state</li>
          </ul>
        </section>
        <section anchor="ce-bound-decapsulation-behavior">
          <name>CE-bound Decapsulation Behavior</name>
          <t>The CE-bound IWF is responsible for removing the PSN and VPWS demultiplexing headers, PLE control word and RTP header from the received packet stream and play-out of the bit-stream to the local attachment circuit.</t>
          <t>A de-jitter buffer MUST be implemented where the PLE packets are stored upon arrival. The size of this buffer SHOULD be locally configurable to allow accommodation of specific PSN packet delay variation expected.</t>
          <t>The CE-bound IWF SHOULD use the sequence number in the control word to detect lost and mis-ordered packets. It MAY use the sequence number in the RTP header for the same purposes.</t>
          <t>The payload of a lost packet MUST be replaced with equivalent amount of replacement data. The contents of the replacement data MAY be locally configurable. All PLE implementations MUST support generation of "0xAA" as replacement data. The alternating sequence of 0s and 1s of the "0xAA" pattern does ensure clock synchronization is maintained. While playing out the replacement data, the IWF will apply a holdover mechanism to maintain the clock.</t>
          <t>Whenever the VPWS is not operationally up, the CE-bound NSP function MUST inject the appropriate native downstream fault indication signal.</t>
          <t>Whenever a VPWS comes up, the CE-bound IWF enters the intermediate state, will start receiving PLE packets and will store them in the jitter buffer. The CE-bound NSP function will continue to inject the appropriate native downstream fault indication signal until a pre-configured amount of payloads is stored in the jitter buffer.</t>
          <t>After the pre-configured amount of payload is present in the jitter buffer the CE-bound IWF transitions to the normal operation state and the content of the jitter buffer is played out to the CE in accordance with the required clock. In this state the CE-bound IWF MUST perform egress clock recovery.</t>
          <t>The recovered clock MUST comply with the jitter and wander requirements applicable to the type of attachment circuit, specified in:</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>
              <xref target="G.825"/> and <xref target="G.823"/> for SDH</li>
            <li>
              <xref target="GR253"/> for SONET</li>
            <li>
              <xref target="G.8261"/> for synchronous ethernet</li>
            <li>
              <xref target="G.8251"/> for OTN</li>
          </ul>
          <t>Whenever the L bit is set in the PLE control word of a received PLE packet the CE-bound NSP function SHOULD inject the appropriate native downstream fault indication signal instead of playing out the payload.</t>
          <t>If the CE-bound IWF detects loss of consecutive packets for a pre-configured amount of time (default is 1 millisecond), it enters packet loss (PLOS) state and a corresponding defect is declared.</t>
          <t>If the CE-bound IWF detects a packet loss ratio (PLR) above a configurable signal-degrade (SD) threshold for a configurable amount of consecutive 1-second intervals, it enters the degradation (DEG) state and a corresponding defect is declared. Possible values for the SD-PLR threshold are between 1..100% with the default being 15%. Possible values for consecutive intervals are 2..10 with the default 7.</t>
          <t>While either a PLOS or DEG defect is declared the CE-bound NSP function SHOULD inject the appropriate native downstream fault indication signal. Also the PSN-bound IWF SHOULD set the R bit in the PLE control word of every packet transmitted.</t>
          <t>The CE-bound IWF does change from the PLOS to normal state after the pre-configured amount of payload has been received similarly to the transition from intermediate to normal state.</t>
          <t>Whenever the R bit is set in the PLE control word of a received PLE packet the PLE performance monitoring statistics SHOULD get updated.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ple-performance-monitoring">
        <name>PLE Performance Monitoring</name>
        <t>PLE SHOULD provide the following functions to monitor the network performance to be inline with expectations of transport network operators.</t>
        <t>The near-end performance monitors defined for PLE are as follows:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>ES-PLE : PLE Errored Seconds</li>
          <li>SES-PLE : PLE Severely Errored Seconds</li>
          <li>UAS-PLE : PLE Unavailable Seconds</li>
        </ul>
        <t>Each second with at least one packet lost or a PLOS/DEG defect SHALL be counted as ES-PLE. Each second with a PLR greater than 15% or a PLOS/DEG defect SHALL be counted as SES-PLE.</t>
        <t>UAS-PLE SHALL be counted after configurable number of consecutive SES-PLE have been observed, and no longer counted after a configurable number of consecutive seconds without SES-PLE have been observed. Default value for each is 10 seconds.</t>
        <t>Once unavailability is detected, ES and SES counts SHALL be inhibited up to the point where the unavailability was started. Once unavailability is removed, ES and SES that occurred along the clearing period SHALL be added to the ES and SES counts.</t>
        <t>A PLE far-end performance monitor is providing insight into the CE-bound IWF at the far end of the PSN. The statistics are based on the PLE-RDI indication carried in the PLE control word via the R bit.</t>
        <t>The PLE VPWS performance monitors are derived from the definitions in accordance with <xref target="G.826"/></t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="qos-and-congestion-control">
      <name>QoS and Congestion Control</name>
      <t>The PSN carrying PLE VPWS may be subject to congestion, but PLE VPWS representing constant bit-rate (CBR) flows cannot respond to congestion in a TCP-friendly manner as described in <xref target="RFC2913"/>.</t>
      <t>Hence the PSN providing connectivity for the PLE VPWS between PE devices MUST be Diffserv <xref target="RFC2475"/> enabled and MUST provide a per domain behavior <xref target="RFC3086"/> that guarantees low jitter and low loss.</t>
      <t>To achieve the desired per domain behavior PLE VPWS SHOULD be carried over traffic-engineering paths through the PSN with bandwidth reservation and admission control applied.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>As PLE is leveraging VPWS as transport mechanism the security considerations described in <xref target="RFC7432"/> and <xref target="RFC3985"/> are applicable.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>Applicable signaling extensions are out of the scope of this document, hence there are no new requirements from IANA.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>The authors would like to thank Andreas Burk for reviewing this document and providing useful comments and suggestions.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="contributors">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <t>Contributors' Addresses</t>
      <artwork><![CDATA[
Andreas Burk
Deutsche Telekom
Email: andreas.burk@telekom.de
]]></artwork>
      <!-- KRAMNDOWN REFERENCES

kramdown examples

references
https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629
https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/blob/master/examples/draft-ietf-core-block-xx.mkd
  https://miek.nl/2016/march/05/mmark-syntax-document/

Example table:

| HTTP | CoAP |
| 200  | 2.05 |
{: #code-mapping}

The mapping is defined in {{code-mapping}}.

Example references:

* Normative reference {{RFC2119}} example
* Informative reference {{RFC1925}} example

-->

</section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC3985">
          <front>
            <title>Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bryant" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Bryant">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Pate" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Pate">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2005"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes an architecture for Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3).  It discusses the emulation of services such as Frame Relay, ATM, Ethernet, TDM, and SONET/SDH over packet switched networks (PSNs) using IP or MPLS.  It presents the architectural framework for pseudo wires (PWs), defines terminology, and specifies the various protocol elements and their functions.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3985"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3985"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4664">
          <front>
            <title>Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs)</title>
            <author fullname="L. Andersson" initials="L." role="editor" surname="Andersson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Rosen" initials="E." role="editor" surname="Rosen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides a framework for Layer 2 Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs).  This framework is intended to aid in standardizing protocols and mechanisms to support interoperable L2VPNs.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4664"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4664"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4197">
          <front>
            <title>Requirements for Edge-to-Edge Emulation of Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) Circuits over Packet Switching Networks</title>
            <author fullname="M. Riegel" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Riegel">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2005"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the specific requirements for edge-to-edge emulation of circuits carrying Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) digital signals of the Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy as well as the Synchronous Optical NETwork/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy over packet-switched networks.  It is aligned to the common architecture for Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3).  It makes references to the generic requirements for PWE3 where applicable and complements them by defining requirements originating from specifics of TDM circuits.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4197"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4197"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4385">
          <front>
            <title>Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Control Word for Use over an MPLS PSN</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bryant" initials="S." surname="Bryant">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="G. Swallow" initials="G." surname="Swallow">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="L. Martini" initials="L." surname="Martini">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. McPherson" initials="D." surname="McPherson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the preferred design of a Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Control Word to be used over an MPLS packet switched network, and the Pseudowire Associated Channel Header.  The design of these fields is chosen so that an MPLS Label Switching Router performing MPLS payload inspection will not confuse a PWE3 payload with an IP payload.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4385"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4385"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.8261" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8261">
          <front>
            <title>Timing and synchronization aspects in packet networks</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2019" month="August"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="GR253">
          <front>
            <title>SONET Transport Systems : Common Generic Criteria</title>
            <author>
              <organization>Telcordia</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2009" month="October"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.825" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.825">
          <front>
            <title>The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are based on the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2000" month="March"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.823" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.823">
          <front>
            <title>The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are based on the 2048 kbit/s hierarchy</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2000" month="March"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.8251" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8251">
          <front>
            <title>The control of jitter and wander within the optical transport network (OTN)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2022" month="November"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.826" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.826">
          <front>
            <title>End-to-end error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit-rate digital paths and connections</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2002" month="December"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IEEE802.3" target="https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3/10422/">
          <front>
            <title>IEEE Standard for Ethernet</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IEEE</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2022" month="May"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.709" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.709">
          <front>
            <title>Interfaces for the optical transport network</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2020" month="June"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="G.707" target="https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.707">
          <front>
            <title>Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>International Telecommunication Union (ITU)</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2007" month="January"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3550">
          <front>
            <title>RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications</title>
            <author fullname="H. Schulzrinne" initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Casner" initials="S." surname="Casner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Frederick" initials="R." surname="Frederick">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="V. Jacobson" initials="V." surname="Jacobson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2003"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memorandum describes RTP, the real-time transport protocol.  RTP provides end-to-end network transport functions suitable for applications transmitting real-time data, such as audio, video or simulation data, over multicast or unicast network services.  RTP does not address resource reservation and does not guarantee quality-of- service for real-time services.  The data transport is augmented by a control protocol (RTCP) to allow monitoring of the data delivery in a manner scalable to large multicast networks, and to provide minimal control and identification functionality.  RTP and RTCP are designed to be independent of the underlying transport and network layers.  The protocol supports the use of RTP-level translators and mixers. Most of the text in this memorandum is identical to RFC 1889 which it obsoletes.  There are no changes in the packet formats on the wire, only changes to the rules and algorithms governing how the protocol is used. The biggest change is an enhancement to the scalable timer algorithm for calculating when to send RTCP packets in order to minimize transmission in excess of the intended rate when many participants join a session simultaneously.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="64"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3550"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3550"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3551">
          <front>
            <title>RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control</title>
            <author fullname="H. Schulzrinne" initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Casner" initials="S." surname="Casner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2003"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a profile called "RTP/AVP" for the use of the real-time transport protocol (RTP), version 2, and the associated control protocol, RTCP, within audio and video multiparticipant conferences with minimal control.  It provides interpretations of generic fields within the RTP specification suitable for audio and video conferences.  In particular, this document defines a set of default mappings from payload type numbers to encodings. This document also describes how audio and video data may be carried within RTP.  It defines a set of standard encodings and their names when used within RTP.  The descriptions provide pointers to reference implementations and the detailed standards.  This document is meant as an aid for implementors of audio, video and other real-time multimedia applications. This memorandum obsoletes RFC 1890.  It is mostly backwards-compatible except for functions removed because two interoperable implementations were not found.  The additions to RFC 1890 codify existing practice in the use of payload formats under this profile and include new payload formats defined since RFC 1890 was published.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="65"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3551"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3551"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2475">
          <front>
            <title>An Architecture for Differentiated Services</title>
            <author fullname="S. Blake" initials="S." surname="Blake">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Black" initials="D." surname="Black">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Carlson" initials="M." surname="Carlson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Davies" initials="E." surname="Davies">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Z. Wang" initials="Z." surname="Wang">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="W. Weiss" initials="W." surname="Weiss">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="1998"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines an architecture for implementing scalable service differentiation in the Internet.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2475"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2475"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3086">
          <front>
            <title>Definition of Differentiated Services Per Domain Behaviors and Rules for their Specification</title>
            <author fullname="K. Nichols" initials="K." surname="Nichols">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Carpenter" initials="B." surname="Carpenter">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2001"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines and discusses Per-Domain Behaviors in detail and lays out the format and required content for contributions to the Diffserv WG on PDBs and the procedure that will be applied for individual PDB specifications to advance as WG products.  This format is specified to expedite working group review of PDB submissions.  This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3086"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3086"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7432">
          <front>
            <title>BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN</title>
            <author fullname="A. Sajassi" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Sajassi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Aggarwal" initials="R." surname="Aggarwal">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Bitar" initials="N." surname="Bitar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Isaac" initials="A." surname="Isaac">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Uttaro" initials="J." surname="Uttaro">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="W. Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes procedures for BGP MPLS-based Ethernet VPNs (EVPN).  The procedures described here meet the requirements specified in RFC 7209 -- "Requirements for Ethernet VPN (EVPN)".</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7432"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7432"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC4842">
          <front>
            <title>Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) Circuit Emulation over Packet (CEP)</title>
            <author fullname="A. Malis" initials="A." surname="Malis">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Pate" initials="P." surname="Pate">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Cohen" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Cohen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Zelig" initials="D." surname="Zelig">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2007"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides encapsulation formats and semantics for emulating Synchronous Optical Network/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SONET/SDH) circuits and services over MPLS.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4842"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4842"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4553">
          <front>
            <title>Structure-Agnostic Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) over Packet (SAToP)</title>
            <author fullname="A. Vainshtein" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Vainshtein">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="YJ. Stein" initials="YJ." role="editor" surname="Stein">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="June" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a pseudowire encapsulation for Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) bit-streams (T1, E1, T3, E3) that disregards any structure that may be imposed on these streams, in particular the structure imposed by the standard TDM framing.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4553"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4553"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5086">
          <front>
            <title>Structure-Aware Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) Circuit Emulation Service over Packet Switched Network (CESoPSN)</title>
            <author fullname="A. Vainshtein" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Vainshtein">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="I. Sasson" initials="I." surname="Sasson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Metz" initials="E." surname="Metz">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Frost" initials="T." surname="Frost">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Pate" initials="P." surname="Pate">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="2007"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a method for encapsulating structured (NxDS0) Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) signals as pseudowires over packet-switching networks (PSNs).  In this regard, it complements similar work for structure-agnostic emulation of TDM bit-streams (see RFC 4553). This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5086"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5086"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5036">
          <front>
            <title>LDP Specification</title>
            <author fullname="L. Andersson" initials="L." role="editor" surname="Andersson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="I. Minei" initials="I." role="editor" surname="Minei">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Thomas" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Thomas">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2007"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The architecture for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is described in RFC 3031.  A fundamental concept in MPLS is that two Label Switching Routers (LSRs) must agree on the meaning of the labels used to forward traffic between and through them.  This common understanding is achieved by using a set of procedures, called a label distribution protocol, by which one LSR informs another of label bindings it has made.  This document defines a set of such procedures called LDP (for Label Distribution Protocol) by which LSRs distribute labels to support MPLS forwarding along normally routed paths.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5036"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5036"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8402">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Previdi" initials="S." role="editor" surname="Previdi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="L. Ginsberg" initials="L." surname="Ginsberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Litkowski" initials="S." surname="Litkowski">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Shakir" initials="R." surname="Shakir">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm.  A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called "segments".  A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based.  A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or global within an SR domain.  SR provides a mechanism that allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SR domain.</t>
              <t>SR can be directly applied to the MPLS architecture with no change to the forwarding plane.  A segment is encoded as an MPLS label.  An ordered list of segments is encoded as a stack of labels.  The segment to process is on the top of the stack.  Upon completion of a segment, the related label is popped from the stack.</t>
              <t>SR can be applied to the IPv6 architecture, with a new type of routing header.  A segment is encoded as an IPv6 address.  An ordered list of segments is encoded as an ordered list of IPv6 addresses in the routing header.  The active segment is indicated by the Destination Address (DA) of the packet.  The next active segment is indicated by a pointer in the new routing header.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8402"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8402"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3209">
          <front>
            <title>RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels</title>
            <author fullname="D. Awduche" initials="D." surname="Awduche">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="L. Berger" initials="L." surname="Berger">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Gan" initials="D." surname="Gan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Li" initials="T." surname="Li">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="V. Srinivasan" initials="V." surname="Srinivasan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="G. Swallow" initials="G." surname="Swallow">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="2001"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the use of RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol), including all the necessary extensions, to establish label-switched paths (LSPs) in MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching).  Since the flow along an LSP is completely identified by the label applied at the ingress node of the path, these paths may be treated as tunnels.  A key application of LSP tunnels is traffic engineering with MPLS as specified in RFC 2702.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3209"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3209"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9256">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing Policy Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Bogdanov" initials="A." surname="Bogdanov">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Mattes" initials="P." surname="Mattes">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any path. Intermediate per-path states are eliminated thanks to source routing. SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions) that represent a source-routed policy. Packet flows are steered into an SR Policy on a node where it is instantiated called a headend node. The packets steered into an SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR Policy.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFC 8402 as it details the concepts of SR Policy and steering into an SR Policy.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9256"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9256"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8986">
          <front>
            <title>Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming</title>
            <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." role="editor" surname="Filsfils">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Camarillo" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Leddy" initials="J." surname="Leddy">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Z. Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming framework enables a network operator or an application to specify a packet processing program by encoding a sequence of instructions in the IPv6 packet header.</t>
              <t>Each instruction is implemented on one or several nodes in the network and identified by an SRv6 Segment Identifier in the packet.</t>
              <t>This document defines the SRv6 Network Programming concept and specifies the base set of SRv6 behaviors that enables the creation of interoperable overlays with underlay optimization.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8986"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8986"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4447">
          <front>
            <title>Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)</title>
            <author fullname="L. Martini" initials="L." role="editor" surname="Martini">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="E. Rosen" initials="E." surname="Rosen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. El-Aawar" initials="N." surname="El-Aawar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Smith" initials="T." surname="Smith">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="G. Heron" initials="G." surname="Heron">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Layer 2 services (such as Frame Relay, Asynchronous Transfer Mode, and Ethernet) can be "emulated" over an MPLS backbone by encapsulating the Layer 2 Protocol Data Units (PDU) and transmitting them over "pseudowires".  It is also possible to use pseudowires to provide low-rate Time Division Multiplexed and a Synchronous Optical NETworking circuit emulation over an MPLS-enabled network.  This document specifies a protocol for establishing and maintaining the pseudowires, using extensions to Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). Procedures for encapsulating Layer 2 PDUs are specified in a set of companion documents.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4447"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4447"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8214">
          <front>
            <title>Virtual Private Wire Service Support in Ethernet VPN</title>
            <author fullname="S. Boutros" initials="S." surname="Boutros">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Sajassi" initials="A." surname="Sajassi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Salam" initials="S." surname="Salam">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Rabadan" initials="J." surname="Rabadan">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="August" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how Ethernet VPN (EVPN) can be used to support the Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP networks. EVPN accomplishes the following for VPWS: provides Single-Active as well as All-Active multihoming with flow-based load-balancing, eliminates the need for Pseudowire (PW) signaling, and provides fast protection convergence upon node or link failure.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8214"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8214"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.schmutzer-bess-ple-vpws-signalling">
          <front>
            <title>Private Line Emulation VPWS Signalling</title>
            <author fullname="Steven Gringeri" initials="S." surname="Gringeri">
              <organization>Verizon</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Jeremy Whittaker" initials="J." surname="Whittaker">
              <organization>Verizon</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Christian Schmutzer" initials="C." surname="Schmutzer">
              <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Patrice Brissette" initials="P." surname="Brissette">
              <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="3" month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document specifies the mechanisms to allow for dynamic
   signalling of Virtual Private Wire Services (VPWS) carrying bit-
   stream signals over Packet Switched Networks (PSN).

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-schmutzer-bess-ple-vpws-signalling-02"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2913">
          <front>
            <title>MIME Content Types in Media Feature Expressions</title>
            <author fullname="G. Klyne" initials="G." surname="Klyne">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2000"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines a media feature tag whose value is a Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) content type.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2913"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2913"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC1925">
          <front>
            <title>The Twelve Networking Truths</title>
            <author fullname="R. Callon" initials="R." surname="Callon">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="April" year="1996"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo documents the fundamental truths of networking for the Internet community. This memo does not specify a standard, except in the sense that all standards must implicitly follow the fundamental truths. This memo provides information for the Internet community.  This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1925"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1925"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source:
H4sIAAAAAAAAA+19a1MbSbbgd/2KnHbcWOhGQhIPG+JO38ZC2MzFoEHY7om9
OxOpqhTUUKrS1AOstr2/fc8jX/UQ0G17eiJ21NFYqsrKPHnyvM/JrG632wnS
MEquD0VZzLsvOp0iKmJ1KCZZdCcLJc6iRInxooxlEaWJSO9UJiYyuFWFmN5H
RXCjQnGuivs0u807cjbL1B08fDbuhGmQyAX0FGZyXnTz4GZRFr+orLuUcd5d
xqrbH3YCGOI6zVaHIi/CTrTMDkWRlXkx7PcP4HYnL2QS/k3GaQIdrVTeWUaH
4n8XabAl8jQrMjXP4dtqwV+CdLFQSZH/n05HlsVNmh12hOjC/0JESX4opj3x
KoO5qiyiiwzftFB3KqneSTNAyDv49Uua0IVnOQymikPd3bMgKlbuRxoq70eZ
FJm7ubwh4PmXWsgoxsnikL1rPeRPdzxSDyZQhfhPPfH+JioKeasyD+Q/qUwt
VrVb3xjmv9OYvXsz5nqgz3viTK0WMkk8kM+jII1lVLlDEB+rsgDiUOJKxeqW
+vraoJ/39Kg/FTxGL1RVkEc9MTUE6gE9usmivIhkUrtLgI+iPEjFdAWLuQDi
O02CHt3MUuQfFUZFmn2DyQSak34KcPwm9s96gNI4lgB8pHLpzeasDGTz3oNz
+bqgxyEOHtysAx0I51xGifSX4FxeqwREiPjvciEz//7vuQiJjG4RnnUzAXqa
RNeJLGSW+vQkszjNa7f+iQsQLHnkdWC/AjZYyDhW1xIEkwf4K5XJOGzc1KCr
BCgqzZZpRkriGwB+nfPIADgM1orvl1l67wsc4l3v6j8N1mCGY66D9ATYU4Y+
W57IKJexu0qA/hzFUfLhG0A3p9HCnz7QAARfJ0rmabYAfNypw04ncd+FuDwZ
7Ry82NNfd/f3d83XwcFz83WHG7zqvRjuDw5pNG1FXEULUHEClDho6SS4ydIk
+oUtCZkvVVDkgBWxZHsiMWYEduAUuMaJNE8eAncUKkvoByAO9QZq/jKJAu76
bYJ/N06v3m4KhkZm14jBm6JY5ofb2/f3972oKHtRUmxnKti+6l6OR12Gnx4I
wS45FMP+4KDbf4FTuxzu7VRm9qOGbHpxPr4SV5lMcqCpwrCwAFoDmACMVyoB
RRmIURYB1JF8dHYwnyDNQt3SQNI/6A76QmN5r4pkUJ5BCiufxiKdi7+DggYj
DXF+D3/gK9hpN4DmMLqOCkCYwbMAXR7cCJkpMZM52HEAbQF9mZVKy9w+A/oi
k1lwsxIb0+PXm7/nEu1V8dLv9ncIAI2bnW+Km2F/94W4nUXFdu5w8ntiY6eJ
DUMkg9+ECZxluiwAtBhscUPWGi9i4+Lq/Pdd/SqDDofdwcDInsp8x0nYLdIu
GA9CZVmaiaXKSMwlgQKJk4HsBSBzwkA6+zvIIhB5uYAmIJI88NGtSNAPKQQs
ezdDp8hQy1IWN9wDtEmwC2j6u4qvKjUAcoZw5XQ8Hr/oD3tV1sCr4PwA9DIL
ad5jWPsMVvrxGcCjrZDluru8FymlevDUNn7ZptG3B/3d4XC7vn79PVq/5/2D
VgFL2JrLQK/Ng+T5+6EeoK/OCxhxX8/reeu8tNMsEtDgTHE4STvHf2khDHOq
Etrzbn/Q6XS63a6QM7BXZFB0Olc3YICFaVCiUy5ClQdZNINllAJY7yZlmlNJ
IJc5hRfAULiJrm+6YBiAwEVmQ8tHgjKVubiLsqJEltNxifsIRHOusrsIKWPj
3eT9dJOjE9qayE10wor0jcn0fBM6SO8ijHhguGAZgxAQOVrFPjnxNxD+SbDq
8bQWURjGCub4DNGapWEZsBkDzP8mLRAoNCcfn3SAhmy4Lr6yMTkbb/4qxLzT
iDEdvkfETBkxFbysi9owXnqCIFcWkryMwDqTy2WsyQV1ospq2GIcCXgyU/8o
YeiQMAKEIYEYxRzELIIP8AK+ykxT+jJThY4nzYnaJ2Nxn5bgYcxQSZXYBheK
kHynYAkuAEvqg8QFw8EAcqG0tDKyF4YejVkaY5cJ4goR6XOSfSYFbcAQzAAN
SpHeW5AOTMuCOiBIF+BCIlYn41wzqcKgDc5NhmGm8pwpCZRKBhiSM3zah4z0
LUylSIO0hjQELpBZBlztHjEkvQWArVI9F/h+I+8iaB+qeZREvByAuzfjE4F2
dDQ3iwS4OkpS7M3iy2JWgrgHv+daiSMgH0MAOIGN6RGwhvpQqCSvIAXwTGsZ
KJx83hMXjDg06gvo0BGjiNWdigVQd3rPolp6WtH2eBLNgApGNxLuxIZJc4t4
H8d4DZZzZYik+qjF6UIFcCnKFzT3OE/ZJt8GEYlrtB1m6VIAWRcRIOMDqnzE
e5bmeVfDl8MyIIQ8uiOntUAhNLbHCn0z/VmR48HG/BWhJLhVK5DpOWCRcVOk
QLkTXlsYFoywjx//Cx2rF7vDz58124WqMiIOU7mAYkflxIHQATgQQAHQMRO6
QutH+ypTjx8mchWnMgRjCdYOmgIhTED+YOdGrlyB/CpBMYDSeXe1ibhDxJq7
I6BwCVBncHcEQmQqIxpfahq8l6stDAeDSATcsOwFQkygTaiWYJyhlIzlCpoa
E7NEazRRUuPZLWal2RajBQQgoQ57N1OVzL85WHiGKGE+IDszt3preu2hAFfe
slkJTrMqKsJ9niKto0ZKggij2iAaF1EsCe96Bff2dmAFZygUPiwBDFwpHF/L
1Rl44cXKZ/UEBAJ0mqOMmosJABg5A2jjarAlxvD/1Q7NabzDa0VMR487HQZP
s6QGZszShVggJ4XRHOgYgS9gikkap9cR9JuX6Ovk1gDcqvLaloeujx/JF/78
eRu+oSEA00MQwC8QfOUArxTiOrqG6RWClFYuZiuBYqLQCFjgcJ7wWGpC9Hgg
1/a02OnBfzQIftvFmX38+Acdmfj8uUdK+ZLVD8X/xXlaWHWsiN1gcQGI7968
nV59t8X/ivML+n45/vPb08vxMX6fvj46O7NfTIvp64u3Z8fum3tydPHmzfj8
mB+Gq6J26c3RX+AfBP27i8nV6cX50dl3TUJCLxNIZuZpR9SjNeJ7OZoMdvXM
h4MBopl/vBg832UxkfBYaRKv9E9A9QqJTcmM2DKOQdYt0ZoEDQMj5DfpfSKQ
kxiNV6DyIqKLFXV1qYhewJR4A3ZqDE0qbTqd78XR6LXoiqM8TwNUlaGV0K+V
BE7GFqdTbAGcsQDjKTTm55TIE+6PXl7C/ZFxs14C1VxCT3hnjDfKvEgXwKTj
8JouTi9H3L4g2YQkNU3LyxHeHONQY3T4AJIpGLxJCFdPxvjESZrdo69DtzEK
mDGJQYPT9yfQgAzm91onnpSJuXt2PIG7Z3IGszoGwc3DwhQmWglhG+zgLEW/
5ESCYIZLbyZnCM0bFNO2qe6GzTAYB9qdT7H7cwq6WdMN2gPL5yki8OL47S20
uNB+zzFqZDDeC3GLN4Hz3D0XidLqnVpUHndNbB+TEQI6uVnl1GJEKUExLWck
HbEBLsSExbddCJTr3TWWLN2+oF7Z7jwDhSsu5m7Vwep0d+tWKd4fIlYmKfAE
OvL0BS7/mTr9MygflJzYISMMbl1O3026VwjTpcrTMgMswhe4LSuLhQiYg8EE
Wu8aYCa9jk9fjXDAy6sJk1Ya+8uLl7FfCWsJesXh0GsDRhS0abOx8CZR5hT0
UaaAPaskmmODY+QjXzsfa7/vtQ00QStaiYd0ODZiaKFvNLkfAfrybp/aXpMs
ukyZochlOJ3APaS2ZSwT6phZb1qL5VruYwujCp8hO4cKRjRBs4hyMjhbMP72
CBH2NpF3EpTqLFYertCtgZsP+T7YauS1GUVZAC4NXr7yLlvzptOZrtHeKAf5
wl7/xT5cIEWrSJjBP/c1eQEO9fuTTbTHSgwcQm9GjNODc90Mxp7FaXALF0Fb
Om9PkV4UxsMDok+J0ditZftSh+kyJKYcw1FakMFIXjf1pzJFkSy0VCtjkOR/
Vhf1OSvPax2+zuzdBd6tGqtTPfxub4DaWWcKLOqat1lzs9mGptBK8Cx7gMWM
DEcysR8aaVjtSqMFfCugtpKWkQOegVqSMSTXCFhyf0ACb9qVWTtifcwG+KhR
71Uc9yjaCt4ASn7ov4489I6wOToEcVxiwKQw40Hbv1Grz587nf8LHx3acZ9P
/4kBieVwKc6G7ybnxmUU3e6Pn5qN6xe8W2saQ/8om4sStTj0uabxnfe3frHS
+Ieu+fxQbezdqDyAI07GA/z2x8qHbwwb4GBHP6wfgW53/AafxLmZbCsG7G39
UOcTmCID8Yl+fRJTuIsWw6ceflAY0Rd9EW/rhiMA9pMb+a/Y9eThken2X93I
foOnzJNxg9AujTrH7tZ9/ioISNMWh3PByCaUdYhd2zVkygElIG5HpV9EprIo
ZHBDqqr+cbeq3Qcs+dv61reYzz4eimeW+zhc+8fvkE1rkvE7YEy8rBazjNwy
klVREi3KBSPkDmBAmaFdQ1BdoFXjpkxBf2avKlOMV4t9UuQFZMQcvDv2m7K0
vGYHlgBwIULojB1ZiZG4QIGgc/ELmJAXIBKdzgmGxcCktotSrJZ6HmiLWkFI
YT2wGJI8Qv07d1kUMhFMDC032bGEJSzBbaEg7xPvjkC8jzkmlbPPQ44E+4Tr
bHOxAbY7hR381tgdWbU8aQQMzOCeOJoXWnfgPPBf5EiYBqkx96xxN3VkicwJ
zvhFuY7JheIukqA1nCjsrZHH+PlT69UHqLr2edX6/F3bxdZPk6Pw0yorWq+T
xG5c/tQFS6lbE8Ioh/l6o0PsxOoQ82Ehue7jN3Qz0eLWg4QUgrlA62WvD6sN
WeY6SGz/Pz4CidfQQfJVcEIfXwjre2buRhH+WH/mEenrff5qnzla+8gPNVJo
J5raMKfVgcZPeAbGcRIVQ05/C9jSZZF6qWKWEyYFNg1UIrMo1eUiKF+vUi+o
xU9rXrURLtQpOhVBsRPDtpJiu1ZIhulCRgkFP7zwe4GRSZ0nYCA69QKVutFG
eQ21jNMVaZ/cAN0u2ndBtBtzEWtlQLRHNp0CwhRj1S3Wn8PW589bHCl0Cs8o
MsbH2JNrmBZaESuw0LJxvgjQw83R+gd3YWXyUJE/Q8CgpPJZgJybn/ZQJHOg
Cu4Sikgn6Z7hIRPS1w9wHpy+HwkKsM0wZ4MThnVfMfLhWfR6vaQLMTY+itCX
uZHQ6LDmBSgLLJvCmDFeRLf2hqJKPVZi7V4Q9ki2ucGOR0V/akzcB9+1a5kn
N3mlY8SGfqpYI5MeNRwuGC5qjvRBwdgA4+tExF7sryfeg78gcKqzOMoxAqJ9
Fp1DCW4idYdImWOCjfJGdUIl0kY1dSOBqWQM9kOIMWVV82S4vkn7SjrjQQQJ
DSjFYLwXigSOjeE2NUnWj8+MMdc1WarPOuFZyUEx7itOr0srIiZMh2QZSDBT
YHkzLCok9LQFpq+O32zZHNmWmFN0OtBxRlb+OqCsnVq8aJMyoX+Dwqot/h1H
mRs+ZbXBbqVBj/xmU+CFwsbEHiquM94whhbKgMRm5rRI86B7ImhoxL2lqh0S
EXleLpacSrrR2Y/RuDtLS5iANoCStGjYcpgRMICZFXRW3Ran9yxC59Se2EkT
j5G4jmv9KWsbi9klUwxE1b5cAkScSdGSRkOjIxImHWEpptNpXCJDkoBHSSdz
lRusupzzU/DbWFkqj7nxqCVHOQODkMnJ3GmzttSdLbPB9XEp/chkpnTSlOxP
45ptTF7/ZZO73AI9A8ACToIoxxChbmujstNyxns1xBlZvRuT0XQTc+MYqqMA
n5fjQag88IyXxoY+CQoSEHrZDUa8Kej0q7iT2YpSnJyRAqbD6g6FhfGBY9B0
qWNadzlCAR5ACqoGw+5U+wkdxKqLQURqgGER/lV4QcCeeC1J1OWYRCRKxnxF
IzVOS46Jveza0N1M5lWq0/EgM21L3V5mD3sBWcuLC3qAdQlVpaJx0mAMn3Jz
Yv1nYtB/9fJoOu5e0njDPf2L+R+D6ppYAHGuqUeDQSxLUF27B9XnW5oM+s85
8eUvUaU8UYr93Zfb+/svBRYFA4DVttxPLp7v0liD/guQ03ogeNYuIK6Zpsdo
bjmUCHF6rmVKhYlJ1RvnjMW9WfeKIKo8tACzp6qe4RmtWdeMg6ITs/u+FKPg
KmiMYt1KuOVr2lHAw5iocUSM+QpTqixiMCIbAGlhugC1aUgPtJxczLCkx6Cf
3fZEk1SDNFF2X61FDGFTO9mio1MzuKAEFV4gxYpDIgRYvO2S/csMJU1MaTk2
t7CXKLmTMXCUIQ2OO+vQMj+iSyRNvYpl8lxsj7exNzDCVFb4+S2xcXayyUOT
cCyoPihpVT4AIyWDwMqB1YaBqGUlPp2patyC+jnrouieKS1/Op3zFAvOTtdM
CIQbCkoUnWjNUOEmG01W1VYho0lxgHYZg5zgmi1ePlIm+BgQQuHDuoUTiLi7
OfoS4TqKDSNCDNMT261kTA/APC2JeKElRzoov4FsQwuBhPdSzVMqcXNFA54e
08Q1Gm89wGRES8QzhkipcU1MoBzbNdyzJfYqjDTo9x+Qabtr2rbIrxdDTk3P
vQFapNzOzq+SckZ/FGioUsrK1MQIVC/5Y1LwYPAvKQRTcY0+qwwwQWHWuilo
GAMtQHEKxRclyMOcbqp5D0bEkDYG0XKr7iuXMkUsjinS3y6cn0Be/wRBjbsv
4ugXFW6tw6VmrigJ4tKV6sTRdULgLGR2i5T/gGz/MtFeHwrQuUhB1v1b7P9/
I/bfI4q+jtD3WN8jHY0Rn+6dcAi94pZWgtS4w7uoN4b9CjvvPqgt1jZuUwSD
g9+gCPAb2fIdCSbg/svt4d5zcx9lU1gGLDBRVeDKcBmlvAUqTNOFrlqt+C9r
xfFvFMIOo4RwDir6UvesKnV1iy75MrEiB6mjK5pCxf4g/l4CuXbxYr3hU2UK
/jahNINMjjsBYhwyYfZ65p2On6uvzr4i6jhkkC6WKsmlLZr3SHLGpk7xqATH
is4Hhe9lYygTdEVhlbrwCMFkWAFWEYQF0Y7HbSa6gYFVztXvDV9s7+3ucmyS
g8cpKvwYH/N79CgdKMojdOPSvzlyESHjpPbEzyIpFzNAKHSzvw8DQ49xinKq
MS0t+iRV1CNLAqCKwrs/fz/s7z4/qHQFVAoYwB1M9BiHdj0gESYgiZIm8DNO
dbBPizSvgt9stzPsiSbSPehMaIZZpaFnEGGrpRL9D/0+rw7GlhQsbYwhTMAS
Fj7pSv7Zqk2YOz1IlE10tPgSV3K9nPoaNspXcvu+X0cUjr//bSL820R4uonQ
kPlGwUGXVvxXbQmjXtYYCN+j40Q6qW5W0HQSp7ys3qs2xBiwqzyf2iCwu/Yr
osDhbwsDT6sV+JJ2YlSSKq4GnqsfH2zNtfMPSydKn2C8nuo2VjowqTmAaBD3
E9RqM5z4cthpiX+2ZBObcmsL/pxwVf/FCcB6XKnn0FK4VVPTPNfpZ1uPglFq
eY8MgvYUINyBjBvGlCXybygxHuKPlrKXWv0IEu2baRcL2zG7XKiEthXrfHTT
nN3vDXu7vQHXPzqimevdNC6/QcXy3bOn9zrgLLMlLe6TCNH1ioxU3T3lmOnq
Qrwci6Pj4/ExN6Ric0youTZ06dvzGg76GK8dPMY9D0RibBwntaVBlIwrcB9S
yBN3vj+mPlCXEEl6ZrTxHVytagXuX8lrZvPHF9grVAj1K00TYnH882aLtmcg
eo7Hr3RavbreTW4nHCMFEp+jmUrowW2tT4yF3EdxbEoSuJoLh5yttMFHSkjn
99fhn2BuiZ79a0sOnOfT5cZgv7fnC40Ds90JoR5Xyv8oJ8goZ8mr90Hz0S5c
i+5cGd73o+vIP36kSkLqm+p2XGFu++cHIagmFj9YeED7BbEm61gtyg+2dAj/
/E/Hqx/awB0x27jjYNOrMKK/P1Y66jxWOUf3t4UekHca5b8KbgQdcGE2HrwH
e7UK9xM6Y7ihF73VyYcaa1X4ch3qJ/Tc9cEUtCNqytK01lkFvXYrSANTCCbf
eyJmnwijrfIiAvJrZluIE+u6QL80CMbbxGoWsr6N3lhEWFqz4roFI+9svchK
14ERpdMxHqYOx/AejdiyjxYh4jCVER+S927ZG2Y3R08ccS8xbeLS+1l1tW61
Y5tpbmzkc1pwr1ffx8A7B1zNqa3Twb2lmNaYKfA58NyRyj4ylLx4beMMNzL4
1URcm4Eb2MwWlh3cwoJGQm3HD99/sdsf8n0ql6N9Ukrvk4LuoP+W7s3GK+5i
Z0h7QHGIS3f1AJwIlDCPkJ/gBdBiyoRuqD6Ndipx/A8QxGK4slO3tn1aT8Xk
YMZJ2Dv+eQizCZe4l6y2qb7y5AHt8wlT3t2hy1E8RmdlDb/Zd2OFGPBeaFt5
aHxm3HsqNnZJUea8YZfas6mBazuPPlA14y9+iZvZ5Lq31zd04d3kHhb6fIJ4
ZXYjtw2uk3x1ccez0PrBHMRQh5v1JhY4OoV4XUYh6S1C2B/0EWBmE46nXD5+
DO6dVum3rPag5dqw5doOPD2AOztiV+yJffFcvBAH4ldcA4H2hf91PvUF/ffp
7NPlJyD5TyeXr1Bano3PPUkrgLF0ZEGH4Kxk/QowWIEb3PvS1l9WKp/lqEAu
+j2uHCNDKspAdiTRDE0TMuIV2cJ9siVdxWihIySOCIBH1u7vFRtHo9ebupYv
EacTY3j49VFkwzENV6AwZaIGEvjM8EvEu4SVCdgCUWm6pwMUKsCtLegz1bc7
2r3A0flUgnmk4jA35k+1t0xrEK9bkLPp/SE6Z2edzo+wvoV1gsdNaPm8DB08
1kMYD5i4id0KHecBlK3zExhfIfCS9qRgNI4Tgk6islKQTlm6zGjJ6oEqfpqC
8Ud/gVHxhCsazXtG79eg0SjeJ6/14S9kkPZwypeiNucqQC2LxZ6V+rBUgIIE
PQhNERgFddtBUMmRmkFHAxaFFe0MmtJGEAYqctvFo9w6cBqrMDktF8nfNMQU
xOBDeIGKsUgTnffxAbFuQGMkrPrTnTAKpu8QBzBSrtmKHQUCnG2NeUmVhkA5
+qAPIrE6ff+istSAhQE8fQAbIDv1ANYeSEZjg4ypjf3lfYLAwj5PKaUFRC91
JfQ63qEeYrACQP5785LxvVzldVB475Kt91zKkL3pMHRlds7nAmxZP3YhY1RG
0Mz4Y2xW0fpsUWEklutdU4AB63uJSKk5cxcpUIMeKorVC1iTyBqhIq8Jap6b
t3HXnldiqrwn781D5KEat08XTrPMKDQOTYBYT6YnTh2JurL9qLIIVsVmZazW
yLU9t4uWTANnUNABEkFmas+pM04KOYRbPzYp2Kx55nkqLCPrVgZ3i6ZKaDS8
tbFNfb+t7idlw6d+2mNFsbSz1jEyc0kb4SVbIBgNQI+XDp2Ads6w27JxC/2s
PaaIjvz2DoHQe/438ICITbBZcqQapr+t1n39YgM3/W9u+ZBhRoXOdcIK6Md3
0IsN3Gy/idXpQW+LBAM6Km6jh9kaTLtE20yuKlZkxXzKCs8r12bEl5lRtpMv
s6a4ly+3Z7Rl9O6Pw0+TTz+DBTUa4e83OrZwJdotq/O6ZfWV4WlBnflc2Y0p
6z/fEp6WsxeI6KdE9Kd4oBIWdGffBh63Ubaw7r6TH2h6fi/e0TH0OaVwWNDe
8c92pTgkET05BA825IQQP2Q0xzyW119B6f18aAxWKz/MSD9XzIfaEO3dV7oe
jQ75UBo6us70CpT8tYyAydWhje1guhyHOELu4GS8VXngAQakVayRZbfVhKtE
LsCXpyc803bl3MyBzh4osEa93VTeHlkW41SG4QYH63KmWHpDfynaCOhT2+dx
cmYLlTt/yhOJa/Vz3ZHSZl+LfvpHydsAixatvsYj77WaAE2ZrOdnTALOFrQO
tM6FpsUY7OPTO0Oy4cAWmIO24hAGneeHOydMYYUBoN6/mWxfb27wNP0N2BMm
kt4Yv95PsApiilnxbnICr//hBD7kg31AL4yWxYo6WhAr9zQJWU/pQRPGDxbZ
cIGJaWCuwT/OslySQOj3xavZMtfRf7PtTWOGN9pZA8QPrxsInY08GO6JN69/
8avG2ONr7nSsHKs5wzqSNXCYvod7feybCRi4/7AhmtkesdSMEkJLBI+miFl8
o3GBZ/Pb04RduN8IAB3oP/KPT6ulX6Vv8Ol9PBxjqpjKvOPdzMeIhLCkujMK
c4LIKpdbtolXhMWcbrk898WEs0gzRZtvwU6+QUEU2qROHM0VWVS+dMHjG2MO
/ZnQrT5fwLp2ckk2Fe4iLJdoiJnYrnYTqhOkbTdDHXnj3XovOSutg+E2juc5
6POIDmgltAGTpWTLkufltusZvAO5MQhW4C7Q5EfPhLZDumQjuJO1G6hzTEYc
61EiW/C38vauNcbU06gk3R6fDe0RrWTq8H0oWN/Op0viGFwspAc0XRDqBNWi
YF4rNPWPUWbas3htBjF6dKIbGNAUYyAEamRaZLVFPjAxSBrIh6CG6AaSEZcA
VwPJj5GUJiICpnJ0IqZ0K5LJbnGsINGlOjWTXpjdk7RK+hUAI726PDKyrtF+
JrzfDKnD8qBOMx6v3jyb8b43eV3JMOR8vhH7w3jHnI3aszWatLWwsgvXp2J9
TiSPrEPvdIjgMs05k2kLuPBE2LYUc4X9Hd2StKAKv42L0eBguOU2am1hLnRI
jpM+xZIUSqXY0ydm6oXS+B6L62iLQWOSU3AAN8GvQyBvkG/iis90yRRvem6c
3OucTnLo3o93zCFhu7um/mf8bnLeJQzoNMJwsKvLlh/cBG5nX0sT/ddp97jn
Xpw1A6+UXpx1t7zPuzwDnILOCTMBYuitQoTPvNx9NSn3Uuc/gCDtsSkEPW3E
LQRK/mbunw9y1ZWKpBkp8cCn4KplTnFSPtUPRTDJ5nXnwXA8lBSWlwLxFp0r
YsKwadSYOIG20kha1wydfIt8B30ktDMOTC0kFw5y/23pQW2Y0856k5f83hxb
p8uI7RFfJmRlCxrgMTZtC3FG8mldZsgaby3SkA0DDHmTdjMdXj6tQ9I7VJfZ
UgrRCIXqaJBteqzaiaVS1KH7qxc9UA2q4eRKwreWJdWI3Xp0gZ1HY+jInPOu
t/WjYIjlqqs5raaojRYmbLToKhTKoerqt2LMSnRTXPTLO9DBqct64UhekP9W
LtHMzPBEQn0OnDFFiOd11/og2ZkGCYjRCiodM+LjT9CwBh0SusMTTN4bsapR
ECpMCNxJDOpjMwy94wHW9QocXCw9sCneWeMsVVbCVRpRPJO2TER51xT4VuKb
YNg+0rW/puZdByjql2UG2kaZMmnvhCbpx1Htouh8hwlz/qNEhJMwXaAXjg+2
p0RwbnRKsKaSRoWvts7bFqYnnmROGKeEl+y7/oejo+/4ZK42gGSsX9NAcVlX
ldxnyTWwkOqOlhKJVNeJssrTrkzjZJCcy4zwhO6QXiUItIVcQhuByqJ1/ls2
hUNFWny+oRQ3aRzyDktb2ACEYbp3rpkuobACyGgUjIrasyUIsUa/PFCkrNNW
ZCs281ZeJqqRw7EZLAuM1BZXips3GmNTyorOuNdOuXf4P4nHLUYHGaJaCBlr
yT9kUzfS+1kWhuorgoWX/YHCOCTRKOEE4ZeiAJyvIoJlpGJsL4Hi2MToWtL7
LMRaofbthMc6a8nWVWVrA/lkfus3G2hpnXBiwL2rgVN29qAeZmTDHdX+cXzM
KIZM56Ysfm2wwry9gmkYc2N8IElhigsrwFa2a6hrzBfUjlnSYkz/NB2bQhEq
Y7KDN9/FlPmnmVdzCWSEr9iKbCqyrcqJHmSL8cE/7jwbemuUKz7WTerVw+7J
fRMXbHuRhjeAaQauU00EaPuHrcp1VgsJeqvcvfjFehGhddkXc0gEDRTrmrpw
dA7eacs2EWOekRGFh6N4Dq8RCryncC2/UBBkw0QvcOcVKFcw63M663hzS0SF
kUu+xbaBlaybHkNIz0fHCUCPiBR6K0QQ61T2Q3OQlf6J4XCUy00dDZNVC4VR
1w2B+EGX4wuJNjGiqHLUE+71H+4BN2UfS4MuT1Sfm0nH0rsZc2AHR9Bvxzke
v/qVkxYT48LqsKUxOqbHXZidBzPtLtVx6kGvN+j3/8OxqFkgzp4O9v6jvWN/
anZG1PMQe2z295w0FKplFSFLUejuYoqOKsy1ZULfnh3QxsnTFs9P959rnnzY
CYF15tSz4WJ3UEObWUq2DAcJvQoRxASIPK0H9Lo/XQdhHQedcmTFin5BBx/Y
bIM+pHV42Irerw1dt2wuv1is0U/vtXQLMN1AAbMvDWuSF1GQG7xfk0uOr9wK
PX9/4j3+xj7OwQz9oKliqDrr9igjMuP4Sda6+kBEHzDzdgpXB8g+hnSx38ar
Allt85a1K+pXZvQ6vpYZu4SUORpb8nl0DC8HFcbTLt455OL32vn5fMK+12Dt
Sft8tLzXsu2I+c4YQ5BaNnEEvdDhxTTx64gKrmFCUt32OJbfH2LfZkXlZAxe
TzS7FiiJrvH1KERaMkEJ8/SO9cQBz2ZizVbENRWB7LJWvtQySHRHhKUzrnPi
d4skKW1Jps78ruVTOudJu7c9rR8MX2LN8onTYjYviRqybzqiF4MBFZVmBfl1
OpEpw0Ggx5yOwNcvEMS5Q06U3ETAwuS0G4HApcHOy691fS9zdgEQxDVj8zbk
6tBUGpcGQUnHX0ra1c0uE3AFxY9UFqWhg61SL9WYQ88EkefreYpNcPOyOzxF
8/qmcNvzKuJX1+1Bb1gebTOZ03MdwXDCqPFGVICie3l86uuRWvFjQyZiCNYK
0J5LW5B/1iodODiaVeOH/rvQWsx6bb3iMfqdZ+LPKeNwhMSbF947J+zOK4J7
ZZw6AmYheRd6OWOdmuJE9PNbtA3TNgU3mv0d/UK42itDN0YvwZSa08vRApm4
4xjDaq+cqbkaTbpzrJ4MQYBxpqZlGwHGmIcHA95Q+lqZIkeKDHlvOeRc4h1S
pzF+LNTG4JmMoXPe7mUCLMfRfI7MaF45tPscfQiVSDo3x6b4XI0c7hbXp+3a
0nqd7zXvzcD3QpUSVEWhFJrN977vgz/NRvlUn3yqA8j6xWZtI9ipuJCaoT+O
xfImhq5yL3vR722tHKcOOCOqmQEk91EI3zLv1TFkbIbmZSWGmPXuBM7+UKkY
4riR7clNSsXL3XCeJPfUphdWoeCZ7i2o9FanAETu892doXXu/uCdXpqp6nnD
9O7Ko/OjJoTOwXR5ES/h4SUwCLbWJMaWuDEUmCldBwc6/77qyxLzIhCMtKPg
NknvgZ6u+T7zIr/TNNcvLoyjW+34yuRWHCUhnY//sgQTg0PNd5HSx+PXcyqO
C8pczcuYEv/sU+PJDOW1ZjqdZbdvlEox1O//+p//hVkCdPNxOyyWUvlw0IVj
VRZ5ANDje1Zv6bXvQoz5peuSG/dm0Pingu/38Nwd+PznH7pd8d+XR2/Ojy/e
n4vL8cn4cnw+Gk87ndtMLtBeN+fFwtD25OK8Y17Seg1kW87wTe7bsIbptnmq
m82D4f7w4MkNt2dxOttegI2jsm0z5HYI/FN0I1XMwdgGi5tOVOh++NBb3IYw
R9P5IlK3vSTeHvYH+9BHFtxs9/e2F3gqQDdfJYX80DVLsw3WlT4Al043AOPu
k3h9dYVvvhilR/AP/MbiC/g97PX34DfteEhD1dXHwegtDuZwmKhWKltpisLR
jOfQRxbluXnVvXcidOUFaxoL+IIwU8xaa4wyeHBA4RXTuNPt/tj5f+thj+Ja
hwAA

-->

</rfc>
